Romance and politics: Love, Romance, and property
There is a lot of connection between love, romance, and wealth, not because anyone with products, items, money, etc. often guarantees reproduction and ultimately love, but because the loved one, and the individual who is our Romance partner is also regarded a property.
At this stage in information dissemination, anyone understands or can readily understand the topic by google, that love, romance, family and interactions between males and females have not always been as we now see them. In fact, the ways of associating for mutual protection, matting and raising puppies at the beginning of humanity were very different from what was intended to make people natural and substantial:
There have been and still are distinct methods of love and romance on this planet, from scarcely controlled liberty to group marriage, polyandry, polygamy, and so on, to our very repressive and questionable lifelong monogamy, which for a large proportion of Chileans becomes a truth in a sequential monogamy, to mitigate the catastrophic psychological impacts of this straitjacket on human beings.
And the primary value in our very western Christian type of social organization is property, property and not the family, as we wanted to produce: the property is what the system protects, not the family. Moreover, the family is a way of preserving the estate.
And why are we desperately needing property? Because she is an instrument to exorcize the distress of the need for survival and the certainty of knowing that we will not survive as well, no matter how much we pervade others. The estate provides a feeling of safety well-being, all that safety we lose by losing the natural cooperative bonds we once had at the start of our species.
And if the family is functional to the estate, the romance property is useful to both the family and the property itself: that feeling that seems so valid to us, that who we love or with whom we have romance on an ongoing basis, is an individual who belongs to us, which is our property: we tell my spouse, my husband, my love, my partner. And what we're saying when we're using this possessive adjective isn't insignificant: we're telling others, the possessed individual, and ourselves, that it's ours, we're going to take care of it, treasure it, and protect it, even if needed against their own will.
This reality, as you can see, is not necessarily abusive or repressive. Moreover, it is often a symbiotic relationship that, although it usually takes the form of a parasitic connection, is generally a kind of mutual engagement and reward agreement. For the remainder, there are those who enjoy possessing everything, stuff, authority, romance because of their psychological features; and there are those who enjoy the reverse on the B side of that personality characteristic: they go light for life, have little to worry about, are possessed rather than possessed, in stuff and in romance.
Therefore, it is very evident and scandalous that there is nothing to see and say that there is a lot of natural and at the same moment atavistic given that the beloved individual or one who is our continuous romance object is profound and more or less unconscious of our being, deemed our private property. There have been times and not very far away when it was entirely valid, but times are changing, at least in wishes and appearances, but at the bottom of us, they are changing more slowly and with difficulty.
And from these forces of tension and comparative equilibrium, from what we are rooted in one sense and from what we want to be as humanity in another reason, from the friction between the tectonic plates of what we are and can and want, an intense war arises all the time, exhausting and too many times deadly.
Thus, for instance, few individuals can keep in public, keeping their foreheads up and without risking some legal issues, that because the dog is theirs they can do with him what they want: common sense, social empathy, and some shy regulations prevent animal abuse-except for that excellent criminal complicity which is the industrialized animal and bird breeding for consumption.
But in a more private sphere, the property of the loved one, of the person with whom we have a permanent romance relationship, is less socially sanctioned, not at all legalized and still legitimized in some way. So much so that while fewer and fewer songs are written that say so, there are still some around, like the "Private Property" bolero of love, consisting of Modesto Lopez, Victor Jara's friend, and retrograde person, at least in their political or Latin American roles, and that speaks relatively of this considering our property to whom we love and romance. And Vicentico introduces the concept to the young individuals in his version of "Something with you"Control your life ' in one of the theme's verses.
That is, little society gets into this problem, which could well be considered as an effort against the dignity of people, their liberty, growth, etc. And this is so powerful that too often, in the face of their partner's infidelity, the individuals impacted are orienting their anger, resentment, hatred, jealousy or pure psychopathy, not against their partner, who is the one who has the promise of fidelity, but against the other individual, as if he had stolen something. Unable to acknowledge that with another individual, it was his partner who voluntarily decided to love or romance.
This pathological perspective, which is nothing but the result of adaptation to a sick society, which makes us the same, is a severe issue in couples or post-separation therapies, because the energies of the "affected or influenced" are not directed to the correct subjects, such as love, change, communication, engagement, etc., but to assets, which steals from the infidel for taking from himself and us.
And there are few moments when this love, romance, and property connection finishes with the one impacted by infidelity locked in prison because of their blindness to know that individuals are not and should not be the property of anybody.
And it's in love and romance, as it is in all ownership, in the best of a pr stamp, though it's often been an ON appropriation.
No comments:
Post a Comment